Christopher Winslow, the youngest of the four Winslow brothers, was born with a silver spoon in his privileged mouth, which has made it difficult for him to establish his credibility in the fast-approaching congressional race. Working against the clock to assure Pennsylvania voters that he is forthright, trustworthy and able has been an exhausting challenge, but Christopher’s chances at beating the incumbant look good.
Julianne Crow, a plus-size model struggling to make ends meet, jumps at the chance to make a little extra cash on the side. What does she have to do? Slip something into Christopher Winslow’s drink and take some very naughty pictures with him.
But Christopher is nothing like Julianne expected, and when her actions sabotage his hard-earned campaign only a month before the election, her guilt is overwhelming. She offers Christopher her help in an effort to repair the damage she’s caused, but can anything change the fact that he sees her as an opportunist and a mercenary? When she starts campaigning for Christopher, he may find out there’s more to her than meets the eye.
Return to the world created in the English Brothers books with this fresh foursome of scorching hot Winslow Brothers!
3.75 stars — OMG you guys, I was having such a hard time coming to terms with how I felt about this book, and honestly my skepticism started with the Note From the Author at the very beginning. She talks about doing research and choosing to go with American Indian or Indian to refer to Julianne based on what she learned, and my whole being just rejected that. I wondered if she actually talked to anyone, or if she’d had someone of that race read the book and gut check it. And even though it’s really not super important to the overall story, it caused me to do my own research after I finished the book. And I discovered one VERY important thing (besides discovering that it’s an extremely complicated issue, and that Ms. Regnery did not make a bad choice as I’d thought): the term Indian is considered much more offensive in Canada (where I live) than in the US. AHHHH!!! I feel so much better! So my whole being rejected it b/c it’s different up here!! I wish I’d looked into it right away from the beginning, b/c I’m not sure how much that coloured my reading, you know? But anyways, you gotta love when a book causes you to learn something new for yourself. Yay for knowledge!
ANYWAYS. As seems to be the case with so many of my reviews for this series, I start off with a related, but not necessarily helpful piece of babbling. The thing is, I really love reading diverse books, but I’m often wary of them as well, particularly when the author does not share that diversity…can I trust that they got it right? As a white woman, will I even know? But at the same time, I WANT to see this diversity. I want to see characters that reflect the varied world that we live in, so I applaud Ms. Regnery for giving us Julianne, of the Lakota tribe of South Dakota. And for not just having it be a throw away element of her character, but something that really defined her and the story that she tells. I felt for her and all that she went through growing up, and I thought that while she had her struggles, she was also a very strong and admirable character. Which is funny considering how the story begins. She’s not so admirable at the start.
I can honestly say that I was SOOOOO leery of this aspect of the story (that’s hinted at in the blurb). Maybe it’s because drugging a person is so anathema to everything in me, that I could not imagine what would transpire to make it OK for Jules to resort to that. And the great thing is that while we saw her motivations, it *wasn’t* a good enough reason. Why is that great? Because she doesn’t excuse it for herself. She made a HORRIBLE mistake and decision. And she never backs down from that or plays it off. From the moment she gives herself time to think, and then investigate, she does what she can to make it right. Because you know what? People do make very bad decisions from time to time, based on a multitude of reasons, but still bad decisions in the end. And every time she lifted her head and sucked it up and quietly apologized and forged ahead, but also didn’t take too much sh*t as time went on, I just wanted to applaud. Because I can love a flawed character that understands their flaws and works on them. I admire that. She was honestly my favourite character of this story, I LOVED her growth and change, I loved that she was forthright about her feelings, I loved that she didn’t play games. And I loved that she respected herself and made hard decisions that were right for her.
Christopher wasn’t bad either, but I’m not entirely sure I had the same level of connection to him. He had so much rage after being taken advantage of, and honestly, RIGHTFULLY SO. But it was hard to fall in love with him. Because *we* as the readers could see inside Jules’s heart, but he couldn’t. So when he would snipe at her and same horrible things, it was just hurtful and hard to remember the context of where he was coming from. I wanted him to be better. And don’t get me wrong, he did get better. But it was hard to reconcile his own development with the development we were seeing in Jules. And I’m not sure what you could have done to make that work better, b/c it made sense. But maybe I’m just not cut out for the enemy to lovers trope. I don’t deal well with conflict. Especially when it’s not born of sexual tension, but where the tension is there in spite of the conflict. It was hard to get into. And I kind of wanted to know more about Christopher’s campaign…or maybe not that so much as to see HIS passion. We saw Jules’s passion, and we saw how much she admired his passion based on his platform. But I wanted to see him get all riled up and passionate about things he believed in. I think that would have endeared him earlier.
OK, so we have a heroine that I adore, and a hero that I liked, but took me longer to love. Which would probably have had this book at a solid 4 stars for me (what? it’s my review, I’ll rate how I want). But there were some niggles, hence the loss of a quarter star. Who was the black hat man? Why was that never resolved? And why bother making Jules plus-sized if it’s never going to come into play? I mean, it’s nice to have a plus sized girl, but it’s honestly mentioned like twice the whole time, so why put it there if you’re not going to give it some play. Heck, we never even know if Chris likes plus sized girls. It’s not bad, just a bummer. And where was Alex? I LOVED seeing Elise and Preston, and even a bit of Margaret and Skye. But why was Alex never with his wife?
So that’s it, that’s all folks. Imma gonna go pre-order me a set of Winslow Brothers paperbacks for the signing in May. As much as I dissect these books and how I feel, I really do enjoy them. They entertain, they give me a solid romance, and sometimes they even make me think and learn. Sweet.